For many politicians and journalists, the source of answers often lies at the top of the hierarchy—among leaders who command institutions, wield influence, and set prevailing narratives. The focus is predominantly on power brokers, with significant stories emanating from their elevated positions. This week, we witness the profound implications of leadership at various levels, demonstrating that power can sometimes be disrupted from unexpected places.

The attention of the media and public opinion often gravitates towards the likes of prominent leaders such as Donald Trump, underscoring the intense scrutiny surrounding political figures. In fact, recent analyses revealed that the terms “leader” and “leadership” were mentioned approximately 2,000 times in the British press, with Trump accounting for a substantial portion of that coverage.

This week has reminded us that authority does not merely reside with the powerful. In Minneapolis—a city comparable in size to Croydon—local resistance has notably affected Trump’s administration. The president’s immigration chief, Gregory Bovino, has faced significant backlash, leading to his departure, while Trump’s Secretary of Homeland Security, Kristi Noem, finds herself at risk of dismissal or impeachment. This upheaval signals a growing discontent with governmental policies that threaten democratic values.

In light of months of activism by Minnesota residents, Trump’s narrative surrounding immigration has been challenged head-on. Surveys indicate a clear majority of Americans oppose the aggressive tactics his administration has employed against multicultural Democratic cities. Historically, party lines have swayed more towards the establishment approach, yet this time, it is the grassroots movements that have taken the lead.

The social landscape is shifting in Minneapolis as ordinary citizens engage in civic activism. Tens of thousands participated in protests against the administration’s methods, even braving extreme weather conditions. Their resolve stands in stark contrast to the evasive strategies employed by some political leaders, demonstrating a new form of civic engagement that emphasizes communal support and solidarity.

Community efforts have been notable, with informal networks forming to aid neighbors in need and monitor the actions of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Stories of brutality, including the tragic deaths of individuals like Renee Good and Alex Pretti, have galvanized locals into action, drawing attention to the very real consequences of government policy on ordinary citizens.

The resistance in Minneapolis exemplifies what historian Moshik Temkin refers to as “leadership from below.” Temkin highlights that during periods of authoritarian rule, real change often comes from those without formal power but with a significant impact through their actions and community-building. This model of leadership emphasizes the importance of neighborly trust and collective responsibility over hierarchical structures.

The fight in Minneapolis is far from over. As ICE continues to exert pressure through aggressive tactics, it becomes crucial for citizens to remain vigilant and united against such oppression. The appointment of Tom Homan as Bovino’s successor exemplifies ongoing challenges, as he has previously been criticized for policies that separate families. Nonetheless, the resilience shown by the residents echoes a broader narrative of resistance against tyranny.

This week serves as a reminder that narratives surrounding American democracy are still being shaped and contested. As noted by historian EH Carr, the significance of any presidency or public outcry will always be subject to interpretation. It emphasizes the timeless relevance of civic engagement in influencing government policies and reflects on the evolving landscape of democracy in America.